Economic Performance of Catch Share Programs

National Catch Shares Workshop
November 19, 2009
Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA

Tuesday, November 17
TimeItemLead

9:00 – 9:30

Welcome/Purpose/Goals/Outputs.  Rita Curtis
9:30 – 10:50

Existing catch share programs - Part 1

a.  AKC BSAI crab fishery (Brian Garber-Yonts)

b.  AKC H & G factory trawler groundfish fishery  (Brian Garber-Yonts)

Session moderator: Susan Abbott-Jamieson
10:50 – 11:05   Break 
11:05 – 12:25

Existing catch share programs - Part 2

a.  NWC Pacific Coast limited entry fixed gear sablefish fishery permit stacking (Carl Lian)

b.  SEC GOM red snapper (Juan Agar)

c.  NEC Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fishery (Eric Thunberg)

Session moderator: Susan Abbott-Jamieson
12:25 – 1:30Lunch 
1:30 – 2:50

Catch share programs being implemented by 2011 - Part 1

a.  NEC NE multispecies groundfish fishery (Eric Thunberg)

b.  BSAI pollock fishery (data to assess salmon bycatch program) (Ron Felthoven)

c.  NWC Pacific Coast limited entry trawl groundfish fishery (Carl Lian)

Session moderator: Susan Abbott-Jamieson
2:50 – 3:05Break 
3:05 – 4:25

Catch share programs being implemented by 2011 - Part 2

a.  SE GOM tilefish and grouper fishery (Larry Perruso)

b.  NEC Mid Atlantic tilefish fishery Eric Thunberg)

c.  NEC sea scallop limited access fishery (Eric Thunberg)

Session moderator: Susan Abbott-Jamieson
4:25 – 4:55AKC harvesting sector employment data projectRon Felthoven
4:55 – 5:25NEC social capital surveyPatricia Pinto da Silva
5:25 – 5:55NEC Catch Shares / Sectors Workshop:Drew Kitts

Wednesday, November 18

8:30 – 8:45Recap and objectives for Day 2 Rita Curtis
 8:45 – 9:45Discussion:  What should drive the choice of performance measures (e.g., objectives of individual catch share programs, MSA requirements, budget initiative objectives, the data we have, the data we should have, what is simple, and what we should be keeping track of)?  Session moderator: Joe Terry
9:45 – 10:45

Breakout Group Discussions:  Potential performance measures for catch share programs

Each of two groups will be asked to answer three questions for a group-specific set of six to seven specific generic performance measures.  The three questions are:

a.  How will we define it?

b.  How will we estimate it?

c.  What are the data needs / data gaps and model needs / model gaps

The potential performance measures include the following:

  • Fleets rationalized (e.g., number of active vessels)
  • Season Length (e.g., days fishery open or days with either fishing or landings)
  • Revenue per unit effort (e.g., per boat)
  • Landings per unit effort (e.g., per boat)
  • Lease price (some regions use quota price or allocation price instead of lease price for the price of buying quota for a given year)
  • Share price (price of the ongoing privilege to receive annual quota or allocation)
  • Lease or share price to ex-vessel price
  • OFL, ACL, and/or ACT overages / underages
  • Profits (with or without fixed costs and for harvesting and processing sectors?)
  • Safety at sea (e.g., number of fatalities)
  • Employment (e.g., total annual fishermen days or total annual fishermen days / crew positions)
  • Well being  (e.g., at community level, unemployment rate / at household level, % families with both spouses present / at individual level, job satisfaction)
  • Resilience (e.g., at community level, occupational diversity / at household level, education achieved / at individual level, available support systems)
Session moderator:  Susan Abbott-Jamieson
10:45 – 11:00Break 
11:00 – 12:30Presentations and discussion of breakout groups’ conclusionsSusan Abbott-Jamieson
12:30 – 1:30 Lunch 
1:30 – 3:30

Discussion: Methods for estimating or predicting the effects of catch share programs in terms of the selected performance measures and additional types of effects (e.g., distributional effects)

a.  Jim Sanchirico: Economic Insights into the costs of design restrictions in IFQ programs

b.  Juan Agar:  Plans for reviewing the IFQ program for red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico

c.  Ron Felthoven:  Evaluating impacts on crew 

d.  Trish Clay:  New Survey Measuring Job Satisfaction among Captains, Crew, and Former Fishermen in New England States

Session moderator: Joe Terry
3:30 – 3:45Break 
3:45 – 5:30

Discussion: Data and modeling needs and gaps with respect to meeting MSA requirements for LAPPs and needed enhancements to design and implementation guidance.

a.  Eric Thunberg:  Excessive shares 

Session moderator: Susan Abbott-Jamieson

Thursday, November 19

8:30 – 8:45Objectives for Day 3 Rita Curtis
8:45 – 10:20

Discussion: Methods for estimating or predicting the effects of catch share programs in terms of the selected performance measures and additional types of effects (e.g., distributional effects)

a.  Juan Agar:  Plans for reviewing the IFQ program for red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico

b.  Ron Felthoven:  Evaluating impacts on crew 

c.  Trish Clay:  New Survey Measuring Job Satisfaction among Captains, Crew, and Former Fishermen in New England States

d.  Eric Thunberg:  Excessive shares

Session moderator: Joe Terry
10:20 – 10:35Break 
10:35 – 11:05Recap and discuss outline for the initial report on a select set of performance measures and an option for doing an expanded report at 3-5 year intervals.Session moderator:  Rita Curtis
11:05 – 11:35Discussion: The obstacles to meeting the data needs and how to overcome themSession moderator: Joe Terry
11:35 -12:30

Discussion: What database management and access tools should be developed to facilitate generating the estimates of the selected indicators for the initial report?

a.  Data access tools

b.  Data verification tools (Larry Perruso)

Session moderator:  Joe Terry
12:30 – 1:30Lunch 
1:30 – 3:00

Discussion:  Data and models needed to improve capabilities to provide economic and sociocultural information for designing and assessing catch share programs and other fishery management programs.

a.  Priorities by Center/Region/fishery (each Center/Region jointly will provide a 10 min. presentation on its priorities)

b.  Meeting those needs (general discussion on ways for us to meet the needs identified)

Session moderator: Rita Curtis
3:00 – 3:15Break 
3:15 – 3:45 
  1. Common areas of concern and research interest.  These could be a focus point for FY10
      and FY11 funding.
Session moderator: Rita Curtis
3:45 – 4:15Closing Thoughts  / Recommendations / Next Steps Session moderator: Rita Curtis